Richards v. Ellis
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMSON, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff-appellant brought separate actions against five members of the licensing board of the Town of York for denial of a victualer’s license for his cocktail lounge on the asserted grounds of bad faith and malice. 30 M.R.S.A. § 2752 — licensing board. On defendant’s motion in each case the action was dismissed for “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted”. Maine Rules Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b) (6). The Court ruled “immunity as a matter of law there being no allegation that Defendant profited from the alleged malice.” The appeals followed…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Rottkamp v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Rottkamp v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Nelson v. TimesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Jones v. BillingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Cohen v. BowdoinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- National Hearing Aid Centers, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.