Legal Opinion

Richards v. Ellis

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 6, 1967PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMSON, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff-appellant brought separate actions against five members of the licensing board of the Town of York for denial of a victualer’s license for his cocktail lounge on the asserted grounds of bad faith and malice. 30 M.R.S.A. § 2752 — licensing board. On defendant’s motion in each case the action was dismissed for “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted”. Maine Rules Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b) (6). The Court ruled “immunity as a matter of law there being no allegation that Defendant profited from the alleged malice.” The appeals followed…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  4. Rottkamp v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  5. Rottkamp v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Nelson v. TimesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  2. Jones v. BillingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Cohen v. BowdoinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  5. National Hearing Aid Centers, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API