Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Brown

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 26, 1971No. 715SC155PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALLAED, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error the following portion of the court’s instruction to the jury on the first issue:

“Was the plaintiff’s negligent breach of duty the proximate cause or one of the proximate causes of resulting injury and damage?”

In this portion of the charge relating to proximate cause, the court used the word “plaintiff’s” instead of “defendant’s.” While this, standing alone, may be considered harmless lapsus linguae, we think it may have confused the jury when it is considered with another portion of the charge on the first issue on proximate cause and assigned…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gillikin v. BurbageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Short v. Chapman Ex Rel. RhoneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Hood v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bryant v. WinklerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Howell v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Thorpe v. BaileySupreme Court of Delaware · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API