Legal Opinion

Hood v. Kennedy

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1969No. 698SC28PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallaed, C.J.

In instructions to the jury the trial court used the following language:

“The sum fixed should be such as fairly compensates the plaintiff for injuries suffered in the past and those likely to occur in the future as the direct and proximate result of the negligent act or acts of the defendant.

The Court further instructs you that in assessing prospective damage, that is any damage in the future, by reason of a possibility of pain he will suffer, or any of the elements constituting damage in this action, then you are to award only the present worth or the present cash value of any future…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gillikin v. BurbageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Short v. Chapman Ex Rel. RhoneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Soles v. STEPHENS FARM EQUIPMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Johnson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. McCoy v. DowdyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API