Legal Opinion
United States v. John K. & Catherine S. Mullen Benev. Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1933No. 6867PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR Circuit Judge..
Tbis actl°n was brougbt tbe Pr0' . yisions of the Tueker Act by the owner of certain bonds issued to cover the cost of sewers and disposal works and cement walks within certain assessment districts within the city (formerly village) of American Falls, Idaho. This action was consolidated on appeal United States v. J. K. Mullen Inv. Co. (C. C. A.) 63 F.(2d) 56 inlying bonds of improvement district will deal with the latter ease m a separate opinion because of a difference in the pleadjngS) Uizh will include herein a statement of. gome 0f faetg applicable to improvement…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Columbia Heights Realty Co. v. RudolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Moore v. City of NampaSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Duniway v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Brown v. SllvertonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Bannon v. BurnesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stubbs v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1938
- United States v. J. K. Mullen Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933