Columbia Heights Realty Co. v. Rudolph
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE. DISTRICT OP . COLUMBIA. The facts are stated in the opinion!
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lurton
In 1899, the then Commissioners for the District of Columbia filed a petition in the Supreme Court of the District for the condemnation of land necessary for the extension of Eleventh street northwest. In due course the statutory jury of seven filed an award of damages and of benefit's. The verdict was confirmed so far as it awarded damages for the property, but was disaffirmed and vacated as to the amount of benefits. The award so far as it assessed the damages was accepted and the money has long since been paid; but from the order setting aside or vacating the assessment of benefits the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Wight v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- United States v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Independent School-Dist. Ackley, Hardin County, Iowa v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
3Cited by41 opinions
- Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Vachon v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Industrial Bank of Washington, a Corporation v. Walter N. Tobriner, Commissioners of the District of Columbia, and Theodore J. ScheveCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Appeal of Cohen From Board of Street CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.