Legal Opinion
United States v. Wechsler
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 5, 1968No. Nos. 11331, 11347, 11348, 11352, 11355, 11356PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAVEN, Circuit Judge:
Involved here is a scheme by certain partners in a real estate development company (Nathan Wechsler, Sigmund Goldblatt, George Faigen, and Seymour Faigen) to bribe two members of the Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County, Virginia, (Robert Gotten and Clairborne Leigh) to vote for the re-zoning of land in which the partnership was interested. Goldblatt, Cotten, Leigh and George Faigen appeal from their convictions for substantively violating 18 U.S.C.A. § 1952(a) (3) and for conspiring to vio*346late the same statute; Wechsler and Seymour Faigen were acquitted on the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Gorin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Harper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Norman ArcherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Enrico Campanale and Donald Matthews, United States of America v. Mike GrancichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Lonnie M. Brown, Robert L. Newsome, James B. Finney, Julian E. Seymour, Jr., and Benjamin Clyde Cranford, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Antonio Corallo, Henry Fried, Daniel J. Motto and S. T. Grand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.