Legal Opinion

United States v. Antonio Corallo, Henry Fried, Daniel J. Motto and S. T. Grand, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 8, 1969No. 331-334, Dockets 32686-32689PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEDINA, Circuit Judge:

Antonio Corallo, Henry Fried, Daniel J. Motto and S. T. Grand, Inc. appeal from judgments convicting them of conspiracy to use the telephone as an interstate facility with intent to violate the New York State bribery laws. The federal statutes involved are the general conspiracy law, 18 U.S.C. Section 371, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1952, which makes it a crime against the United States to use an interstate facility with intent to “promote, manage, establish, carry on, or facilitate the promotion, management, establishment, or carrying on, of any unlawful activity,” including…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. State v. WoleryOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. United States v. Dennis Geaney and Vincent Russell LynchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Norman ArcherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. AmmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. RoselliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API