Bailey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The Department of Employment Services (DOES) determined petitioner to be temporarily ineligible for unemployment compensation because he failed to file a timely intra-agency appeal of the claims examiner’s finding that petitioner had been discharged for misconduct. Petitioner seeks review here, urging that he received inadequate notice of the time within which he could appeal. We agree with petitioner, reverse, and remand for a determination on the merits.
On or about November 28,1983, the Capital Area Community Food Bank discharged petitioner for insubordination. On December 7, petitioner…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gosch v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Ploufe v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Thomas v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cobo v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Nelson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Askin v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Capitol Hill Restoration Society v. District of Columbia Mayor's Agent for Historic PreservationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re D.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.