Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Kartarik, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 22, 1955No. 14958PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.
A consent decree has previously been entered by us, 8 Cir., 209 F.2d 956, granting enforcement of an order issued by the National Labor Relations Board against respondent, 103 N.L.R.B. No. 64. One of the prescriptions of that order was that respondent should make whole three named employees for such loss of pay or earnings as they had sustained from respondent’s unlawful discharge of them.
Following the entry of the consent decree, the Board engaged in a further hearing to determine the amount of the back-pay owing to each employee and issued a supplemental order…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Brooks v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Palmer v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Armco Drainage & Metal Products, Inc., Fabricating DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Nancy Sullivan v. C. Francis Murphy, Corporation Counsel of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- National Labor Relations Board v. Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- National Labor Relations Board v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Brady v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- National Labor Relations Board v. Ozark Hardwood CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.