Legal Opinion

Southern Ry. Co. v. City of Greenwood

District Court, W.D. South Carolina

Decided February 1, 1928No. 196PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, District Judge.

This matter comes before me upon a motion by the defendants for an order “requiring the Clerk of Court to place this ease on Calendar One for trial for the reason that the pleadings raise an issue of title to real estate, which under the Constitution and laws of the State of South Carolina is triable by a jury.” Complainant filed its bill in equity in which the essential facts to be considered in this motion, briefly stated and omitting formal jurisdictional averments and matters of mere historical detail, may be summed up as follows:

Southern Railway Company,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Abrey v. ReuschDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  3. Clifton Mfg. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1933
  4. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API