Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ross v. Bernhard

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 10, 1969No. 42Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Stewart, with whom The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Harlan join,

dissenting.

In holding as it does that the plaintiff in a shareholder’s derivative suit is constitutionally entitled to a jury trial, the Court today seems to rely upon some sort of ill-defined combination of the Seventh Amendment and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Somehow the Amendment and the Rules magically interact to do what each separately was expressly intended not to do, namely, to enlarge the right to a jury trial in civil actions brought in the courts of the United States.

The Seventh Amendment, by its…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Luria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API