Legal Opinion

Clifton Mfg. Co. v. United States

District Court, W.D. South Carolina

Decided January 31, 1933No. 1498PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, District Judge.

Statement of Issues.

’While” the pleadings in this ease are voluminous, the real issues may be stated more briefly. The statement of facts hereinafter set out will serve to present the issues in such further detail as may be necessary to their complete understanding.

The complaint was filed on October 13, 1931. It demands judgment against the defendant for the sum of $162,805.61 and interest, as a refund of taxes claimed to have been illegally assessed and collected after such assessment and collection had been barred by the statute of limitations (See 26 USCA § 1065 and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Tyler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Florsheim Brothers Drygoods Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Admiral Oriental Line v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. Clifton Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  3. Simmons v. WestoverDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  4. Zellerbach Paper Co. v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  5. Clifton Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API