Legal Opinion

Hartley v. Hartley

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 20, 1860PublishedCited by 14 opinions

CASE 15 — PETITION ORDINARY — APPEAL FROM FLEMING CIRCUIT COURT. cited ■Rev. Statutes, chap. 102; acts of 1831 and 1835; 4 Dana, 321. cited 2 Bibb, 416-17 ; 3 Marshall, 255; 3 Litt., 37; 5 lb., 321; 4 Bibb, 554; act of 1831, 2 Stat. Law, 1037; act of 1835, 3 Stat. Law, 387; 6 B. Mon., 290-1; 5 Dana, 544, 547; 4 Dana, 322.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE WOOD

DELIVERED THE OPINION 01? THE COURT:

The appellee claimed the land in controversy in this action under and in virtue of two patents issued to him by the Commonwealth in June, 1857, upon an entry and survey made under an order of the Fleming county court, as authorized by chapter 102 of the Revised Statutes. There is no doubt that the land is covered by these patents, one or both.

The appellant has not exhibited any evidence of title in himself, derived regularly from the Commonwealth. The character of his claim was shown by his answer to the petition of the appellee, which was filed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pearson v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
  2. Chiles v. CalkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1817

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Whitley County Land Co. v. Powers' HeirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Frazier v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883
  3. Inhabitants of Hyde Park v. WigginMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Keown v. HughesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. McGovern v. RectanusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API