Inhabitants of Hyde Park v. Wiggin
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBarker, J.
We are asked to prohibit the county commissioners of Norfolk County from proceeding further upon a petition representing that public convenience and necessity require Metropolitan Avenue in Hyde Park to be laid out as a highway. The commissioners, one of whom, Morrell, was a resident of Hyde Park, were sitting on May 20, 1890, in an adjourned regular meeting, when this petition was presented. Thereupon Morrell retired from the room and from the deliberations of the board, and he has not either then or afterward acted on the petition. Upon his withdrawal, no one then appearing in oppo*95sition,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Connecticut River Railroad v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Commonwealth v. Inhabitants of WestboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Cabell v. Cabell's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
- Overly's v. Overly's DeviseesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
- Walker v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ashley v. Three Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Riley v. BrusendorffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Welch v. FoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Blaisdell v. Inhabitants of the Town of YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
- Kevorkian v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.