Legal Opinion

Chaney v. Los Angeles County Peace Officers' Retirement Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1943No. Civ. 14057PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeCOMB, J.

This is an appeal, on the judgment roll alone, from a decree granting a writ of mandate directing payment to petitioner of a pension of $75 per month as the widow of Albert G. Chaney who had been retired on a pension pursuant to the provisions of Act 5848 of Deering’s General Laws (Chapter 268, page 477, Statutes of 1931, as amended), which act will hereinafter be referred to as “the act.” This act provides for a peace officers’ retirement system in every county which, by ordinance passed by a four-fifths vote of the Board of Supervisors, accepts the provisions of the act.

The essential facts…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Sweesy v. Los Angeles County Peace Officers' Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Jordan v. Retirement BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Vanderbilt v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Ostrander v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Packer v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Eichelberger v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Brophy v. Employees Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Ross v. Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief & Pension FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API