Legal Opinion

McCracken, Guardian v. Travelers' Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 21, 1916No. 6365PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from District Court, Osage County; R. H. Hudson, Judge. Action by M. E. McCracken, guardian, etc., against the Travelers’ Insurance Company of Hartford, Conn. •Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This was an action on a contract for accident insurance, where no policy was actually issued, although an application for one had been made and the premium therefor paid. The application and the premium were accepted, as the plaintiff in error claims, and the contract entered into. There were two counts in the petition, one alleged the making of the contract and a failure to issue and deliver the policy, whereby the plaintiff in error was damaged in the sum of the amount of the policy, and the second count alleged the making of a .contract for the insurance and a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. BabcockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Preferred Accident Insurance v. StoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  3. Dorman v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Shawnee Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. McClureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Co v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Security Ins. Co. of New Haven v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co. v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Glens Falls Insurance Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Prudential Fire Ins. Co. v. StanleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. De Noya v. Fidelity Phoenix Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API