Legal Opinion
Brandenburg v. SF & G. CO., INC.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 13, 1955No. [No. 172, October Term, 1954.]PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the appellee, defendant, as the result of an instructed verdict granted at the end of the appellant’s, plaintiff’s, case.
On April 12, 1954, the plaintiff, Claude F. Brandenburg, filed a declaration in assumpsit against the defendant, S. F. & G. Company, Inc., alleging that he had performed work for the defendant in superintending carpentry work and general supervision of construction of apartments, that he had not been paid for his work, and asking damages therefor.
After demand, a bill of particulars was filed by the plaintiff stating that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Martin v. CampanaroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Adams v. . FitzpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Brightson v. H. B. Claflin Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
- McCullough Iron Co. v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
- Huntingdon v. . ClaffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Labrecque v. Sunbird Boat Co., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1994
- Lerner v. AmmermanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- CPC Health Corp. v. Goldstein (In Re CPC Health Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Brazil v. Menard, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2022