Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Hillerson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1915No. Appeal, No. 172PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 172, Oct. T., 1914, by defendants, from, judgment of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., March T., 1913, No. 4,786, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Joseph W. Jackson v. David Hillerson and Theodore M. Boyer. Trespass for malicious prosecution. Before AudenRIED, J. At the trial it appeared that on March 20, 1913, the plaintiff found in the office of the Northwestern Trust Company of Philadelphia, a paper package containing forty uncut diamonds.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 172, Oct. T., 1914, by defendants, from, judgment of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., March T., 1913, No. 4,786, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Joseph W. Jackson v. David Hillerson and Theodore M. Boyer. Trespass for malicious prosecution. Before AudenRIED, J. At the trial it appeared that on March 20, 1913, the plaintiff found in the office of the Northwestern Trust Company of Philadelphia, a paper package containing forty uncut diamonds. There was no evidence that the plaintiff knew to whom they belonged. He took them home, and two days afterwards seeing an advertisement of the…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

This case is clearly within the rule indicated in Leibig v. Steiner, 94 Pa. 466, "Exceptional cases arise where it is the duty of the trial judge to express his opinion of the facts and guide the minds of the jury to a correct view of the evidence; and therefore it has been settled that when he does so, without misleading or controlling them in the disposition of the facts, there is no error for reversal:” Knee v. McDowell, 25 Pa. Superior Ct. 641; Fredericks v. Northern Central Railroad, 157 Pa. 103.

Whether certain facts constitute probable cause must be determined by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. De ArmitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  2. Burk v. HowleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Fredericks v. Northern Central R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Leibig v. SteinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  5. Smith v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shambe v. Delaware Hudson R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Taylor v. American International Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Law v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Trautman v. WillockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Di Santo v. Alper Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API