Legal Opinion

Trautman v. Willock

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1926No. Appeal 178PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

Plaintiff obtained ia verdict in an action of trespass for malicious prosecution. He appeals from the entry of judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto.

Plaintiff was a truck driver for the Waverly Oil Works. It was his duty to receive iron barrels or drums of gasoline and oil at the company’s warehouse in Pittsburgh, pursuant to written orders, and deliver them to customers of his company or to railroad stations to be shipped as freight; and collect and return empty drums. He had no authority to sell merchandise from the truck, collect moneys, or make any…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Taylor v. American International Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. McClafferty v. PhilpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Robitzek v. DaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Cooper v. William R. Hart & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Bernar v. DunlapSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Franz v. Foster, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1927
  3. Miller v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API