Legal Opinion

Di Santo v. Alper Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1930No. Appeal 24PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This action in assumpsit was brought by the plaintiff to recover from the defendants the sum of $100 which the plaintiff claimed to be due him under an oral contract, by which the defendants agreed to pay him that amount in consideration that he furnish $2,000 of the $4,000 bail required by Eli Alper, who was then in jail. The defendants acknowledged that they promised to pay the plaintiff $100 but claimed that he was to secure the entire amount of the $4,000 bail and that $40 was paid by them to him on account thereof, but that he never furnished the bail. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kramer v. KisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Commonwealth v. BreyesseeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  4. Reitenbaugh v. LudwickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  5. Fitzpatrick v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bitting v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API