Di Santo v. Alper Et Ux.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
This action in assumpsit was brought by the plaintiff to recover from the defendants the sum of $100 which the plaintiff claimed to be due him under an oral contract, by which the defendants agreed to pay him that amount in consideration that he furnish $2,000 of the $4,000 bail required by Eli Alper, who was then in jail. The defendants acknowledged that they promised to pay the plaintiff $100 but claimed that he was to secure the entire amount of the $4,000 bail and that $40 was paid by them to him on account thereof, but that he never furnished the bail. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kramer v. KisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Commonwealth v. BreyesseeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- Reitenbaugh v. LudwickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
- Fitzpatrick v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bitting v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951