Legal Opinion
United States v. Steinschreiber
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 29, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYLER, District Judge.
Trial of this indictment was had from April 8 to April 26, 1963, inclusive before this court without a jury.
Count 1 of the indictment charges all of the defendants with conspiracy to manufacture and prepare normal human blood plasma without a license issued by the Department of Health, Education and'. Welfare (“HEW”) 1 and to carry, send and bring such plasma for sale from certain states into other states and foreign countries in violation of the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 262(a).
Counts 2 through 9 of the indictment charge defendant Sidney Steinschreiber with the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Direct Sales Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. Standard Brewery, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Brogdex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Frozen Food ExpressSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maxine Blank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Gaind v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- United States v. Sidney Steinschreiber, Doing Business as Sidcaps Laboratories, John P. Calise, Westchester Blood Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- United States v. SteinschreiberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964