Legal Opinion

Gaind v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 17, 1994No. 94 Civ. 8949 (VLB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.

I

Petitioner Arun Gaind was found guilty on August 31,1992 of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and to cause a company controlled by him to submit false statements to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by backdating tests. Gaind was also convicted of making actual false statements to the EPA; and of committing perjury before a federal Grand Jury investigating the matter.

Sentence, imposed on June 11, 1993, included thirty-three (33) months’ imprisonment and restitution to the EPA of $511,-263.88. I departed downward from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Texaco Inc. v. HasbrouckSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. Jacob Brach, Also Known as Jack, Also Known as Jack Brock, Also Known as Jacob BrockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. FerrantiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  2. People v. Cruz, DydascoSuperior Court of Guam · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API