Legal Opinion

Coltey v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 31, 1991No. 90-591PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The defendant, New England Telephone and Telegraph Company (NET), has filed an interlocutory appeal from the Superior Court’s (M. Flynn, J.) order denying its motion for summary judgment and thus requiring the self-insured employer to provide uninsured motorist coverage to an employee injured in a work-related accident. We reverse.

It is undisputed that the plaintiff, Moses J. Coltey, was injured in a work-related accident by a still unidentified hit-and-run driver during his employment with NET. He received workers’ compensation benefits for the injuries he sustained, but sought additional…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hill v. Catholic CharitiesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Dionne v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McSorley v. Hertz Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Progressive Northern Insurance v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. of Boston, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  3. State v. Jeffrey R. KeenanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
  4. (2000), Maryland Attorney General Reports2000
  5. McSorley v. Hertz Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API