Legal Opinion
Hill v. Catholic Charities
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided September 28, 1983No. 82-341PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McGILLICUDDY
This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant, Catholic Charities, holding that self-insurers are not required to provide uninsured motorist coverage with respect to motor vehicles covered by certificates of self-insurance.
On March 15, 1979, plaintiffs, Candy Hill and Edna Ross (Hill and Ross), were riding in a vehicle owned by defendant, Catholic Charities. The vehicle was involved in a collision with a hit-and-run driver. Hill and Ross allegedly incurred injuries and damages as a result of the collision.
Catholic Charities is an agency of the Catholic Bishop of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Steel Foundries v. GordonIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
- Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. Consolidated FreightwaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Johnson v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Patterson v. Durand Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- McSorley v. Hertz Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Passamano v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Ramos v. City of CountrysideAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Van Vonno v. Hertz CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Ryan v. LandekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.