Legal Opinion

(2000)

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided January 24, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear County Attorneys and Solicitor:

You have requested our opinion whether your self-insured counties must maintain no-fault personal injury protection ("PIP") and uninsured motorist ("UM") coverage on their vehicles. The Motor Vehicle Administration ("MVA") requires self-insured entities that participate in the MVA's self-insurance program under Annotated Code of Maryland, Transportation Article ("TR"), § 17-103, to carry such coverage.

In our opinion, counties are not required by statute to maintain PIP and UM coverage on their vehicles. Thus, like the State, counties that self-insure are…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harden v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Allstate Insurance v. ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Ellis v. Rhode Island Public Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  4. Hartford Insurance v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. McSorley v. Hertz Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API