Legal Opinion

Blakeley v. Pilgrim Packing Co.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 14, 1976PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, C.J.

The plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal of

their bill in equity to restrain certain activities of the defendants, alleged to violate restrictive covenants in a deed and in a separate restrictive agreement. The suit was referred to a master, who reported subsidiary findings and ultimate conclusions. He made a summary of evidence under Superior Court Rule 90 (1954) (see now Rule 49 [7] [1974]) in response to certain objections made by the plaintiffs. 2

The plaintiffs are the trustees of two Massachusetts trusts, Ninety-Three Industrial Center Trust (the Trust) and Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Co.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stewart v. FinkelstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Three Sons, Inc. v. Phoenix InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  3. Joseph E. Bennett Co. Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  4. Jones v. GingrasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  5. Erickson v. City of WalthamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Coll v. PB Diagnostic Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Pritam SinghCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. Covich v. ChambersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Fairfield 274-278 Clarendon Trust v. Robert M. DwekCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  5. Sanguinetti v. Nantucket Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API