Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert Paul Sarro, John Michael Tiedeberg, James Gennaro Tortoriello
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 13, 1984No. 83-5266PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1289HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
Appellants, Robert Sarro, James Tortoriello, Jr., and John Michael Tiedeberg, appeal their conviction for conspiracy to transport in interstate commerce two paintings valued at $5,000 or more, knowing the paintings to have been stolen, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 371 (West 1966), and 18 U.S.C.A. § 2314 (West 1970). We affirm the convictions of Robert Sarro and James Tortoriello, Jr., but we reverse the conviction of John Michael Tiedeberg.
Facts
In July, 1982, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Agents Brown and Hanlon sought to recover two paintings which had been…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Augustin Alvarez, Oscar Hernandez, Mario C. Simon, Rolando Rios, Ramon Raymond, Eduardo Portal, Victoriano Concepcion, A/K/A "Macho"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Bishop CapersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Manuel Vasquez and Jose Pollo RenteriaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Angel Petit, Roger Fernandez, Francisco PasqualCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.