Legal Opinion
United States v. Angel Petit, Roger Fernandez, Francisco Pasqual
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 11, 1988No. 86-5945PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:
In this sting operation, the government obtained the permission of a carrier of electronic equipment to use the equipment while it was en route to its purchaser. As a result of their efforts to purchase the equipment, Roger Fernandez, Francisco Pasqual, and Angel Petit were convicted of conspiracy to possess stolen goods, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. 1 Five issues are presented on their appeal: (1) whether appellants were properly convicted of conspiring to receive and possess goods “stolen” from interstate commerce; (2) whether the goods were in “interstate…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Joe Church, Gregory Jacobs, Michael Dooly, and Frank Chisom v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Wallach, Rusty Kent London, Eugene Robert Wallach, A/K/A "E. Robert (Bob) Wallach," and Wayne Franklyn ChinnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Mervyn Harold Cross A/K/A Eric Cross, and Robert Carter LodgeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Hien Hai Hoac, United States of America v. Hgai Choy ChanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Leonardo Mendoza-Cecelia, Terry Lee Greenberg, Hector Favio Marin-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.