Stiller v. Rogers

The real question before us for determination is whether the evidence supports the court’s findings that of the $200 received by the defendant lawyer from the sheriff, on order of Betty Rogers, $149 was money stolen from plaintiff by her and that the defendant knew or should have lmown that such money was so stolen. The fact that she did steal $918 from him is not questioned here, and the evidence is ample to show it.

Viewing the evidence, as we must, most favorably in support of the judgment, the record discloses facts readily sufficient to warrant the trial court in finding that, of the $501 *807…