First Nat'l Bank of Bridgeport v. Perris Irrigation Dist.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment in the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The COURT.
Plaintiff a corporation, commenced this action July 22, 1893, to recover of defendant a sum of money alleged to be due the plaintiff under an assignment of a claim therefor to it made by the Ætna Iron and Steel Company, also a corporation, on May 16, 1893. The defendant is an irrigation district formed under the statute providing for the organization and government of such districts, approved March 7, 1887. One W. L. Ewing filed a complaint in intervention, but the findings and judgment were against him, and he has not appealed. The case comes here on the judgment-roll alone.
From…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bates v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- West Coast Lumber Co. v. NewkirkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Southern California Lumber Co. v. SchmittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Wright & Co. v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- North Pacific Railroad v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- French v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. CasadyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Bianchi v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- American Bridge Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Miles v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.