Davies v. JEZEK
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The plaintiff Ralph E. Davies 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after the court denied his motion to set aside the verdict in favor of the defendant, attorney Scott Jezek, following a jury trial. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) failed to set aside the verdict because it (a) permitted the defendant’s counsel to make a missing witness argument and (b) improperly instructed the jury on assumption of risk, and (2) failed to grant the plaintiff a new trial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The court found the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Asherman v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Donner v. KearseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Sturgeon v. SturgeonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- LaCroix v. Glens Falls InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hammond v. City of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012