Legal Opinion

Hammond v. City of Bridgeport

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 18, 2012No. AC 33491PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

The defendants, the city of Bridgeport (city) and its insurer Berkley Administrators of Connecticut, Inc., appeal from the finding and award of the workers’ compensation commissioner for the fourth district (commissioner) rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Mark Hammond, on his discriminatory discharge claim. On appeal, the defendants claim that the commissioner erred in (1) finding that the city discriminated against the plaintiff, (2) denying their “motion to reopen award, consider newly discovered evidence, reconsider/reissue finding and award and for a new trial/ formal”…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Genovese v. Gallo Wine Merchants, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Szudora v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Christine Baldracchi v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Division, United Technologies CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Besade v. Interstate Security ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Callender v. Reflexite Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Dickman v. University of Connecticut Health CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. Weaver v. McKnightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
  4. Weaver v. McKnightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API