Legal Opinion

People v. Spalsbury

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 12, 2005No. 04PDJ080PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1053OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS

SANCTION IMPOSED: ATTORNEY SUSPENDED FOR ONE YEAR & ONE DAY

I. ISSUE

Respondent and his wife divorced in November 2002 and the district court ordered him to pay monthly child support. Although Respondent is aware of this obligation, he has not made a payment since September 2003 and now owes over $10,000. Generally, suspension is the appropriate sanction if a lawyer knowingly violates a court order and thereby causes injury. Respondent claims he is unemployed and cannot pay. Has he nevertheless violated the court’s order?

The Hearing Board heard no evidence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. In Re PautlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. In Re DeRoseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. People v. TuckerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. People v. HanksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. CurryOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. CurryOhio Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API