Brasier v. Jeary
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
VOGEL, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal there is raised the single ■question of whether a party to a civil suit may appear pro se and insist on the right to be represented by counsel at the same time. Appellant, a non-resident of Nebraska, commenced this suit for damages signing the complaint “George H. Brasier, Plaintiff, pro se”. The complaint was also signed by “J. A. Hayward, Resident Attorney”, with whom appellant had a written contingent fee contract. Before commencement of the jury trial and in chambers, Mr. Hayward made the following motion:
“On behalf of the plaintiff we move the court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Herron v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- United States v. Robert Neil Conder, United States of America v. Bernard Joseph Grogan, United States of America v. William Moore PegramCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Turner v. American Bar Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1975
- Gerald D. Peterson v. Isadore NadlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.