Legal Opinion

United States v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 8, 1943No. 318PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

The parties have now shown us that the abbreviated narrative record was erroneous in that the incident when during trial defendant attempted to dismiss his attorney occurred not after the completion of his wife’s testimony, but just after the first witness for the prosecution had been sworn and before the actual taking of testimony had begun. It now appears that a jury was impaneled late on Friday afternoon, March 13, 1942, and that the incident occurred just as trial was resumed at noon the following Monday. An objection so made at this early stage of a trial may well be…

2Cited by65 opinions

  1. United States v. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. United States v. William BentvenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Bobby G. SealeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  5. Roosevelt Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API