Legal Opinion

People v. Whittaker

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 23, 1974No. Crim. 12116PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

Israel Whittaker was convicted by a jury’s verdicts of three counts of first degree (armed) robbery. (Pen. Code, §§211, 211a.) As to each of the counts the jury found that in the commission of the offense he used a firearm. (See Pen. Code, § 12022.5.) Further, as to one of the counts, they found that he, “with the intent to inflict such injury, inflicted great bodily injury on the victim of the robbery, . . .” (See Pen. Code, § 213.) The appeal is from the judgment which was entered on the verdicts.

We have concluded that the judgment must be affirmed. Our reasons follow.

I.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. MosherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. MassieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. McPetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In re CulbrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. MakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Titus Lee Brown, Jr. v. Robert BorgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API