Legal Opinion
State v. LeCouffe
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 22, 2005No. 2004-526PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The defendant, Joseph LeCouffe, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Burling, J.) denying his motion to modify his sentence. We vacate and remand.
The defendant was convicted of burglary, see RSA 635:1 (1996), and aggravated felonious sexual assault, see RSA 632-A:2, I (1986) (amended 1992, 1995) on April 15, 1992. He is currently serving two consecutive seven and one-half to fifteen year sentences in New Hampshire State Prison.
In response to the defendant’s June 6, 2002 motion for reduction of sentence, the Superior Court (Smith, J.) held: “Provisions of RSA 651 are waived. May reapply…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Sattazahn v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Stapleford v. PerrinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- State v. BurgessSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Guardarramos-CepedaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. GibbsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- State v. MateySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. AbramSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.