Legal Opinion
In re Guardarramos-Cepeda
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 2, 2006No. 2005-333PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.
The petitioner, Gregorio B. Guardarramos-Cepeda, challenges the constitutionality of RSA 651:58, I (Supp. 2005), which permits the State to seek sentence review, arguing that it violates the due process and double jeopardy protections of the New Hampshire Constitution. We deny the petition.
Following a jury trial, the petitioner was convicted of possession of five grams or more of heroin with the intent to sell and conspiracy to sell five grams or more of heroin. See RSA 318-B:2,1 (2004); RSA 318-B:26,1(a)(3) (Supp. 2005); RSA 629:3 (Supp. 2005). The Trial Court (Hicks, J.) imposed two…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. BlackmerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Baines v. New Hampshire Senate PresidentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- State v. McLellanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Appeal of AlexanderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Diana Camire v. The Gunstock Area CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Cloutier v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Galvin, et al. v. EMC Mortgage Corporation, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
- Petition of EvansSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.