Legal Opinion
State v. Abram
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 15, 2008No. 2007-036PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The defendant, Scott Abram, appeals the sentence imposed by the Trial Court (McGuire, J.) upon remand from our decision in State v. Abram, 153 N.H. 619 (2006). We vacate and remand.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. In 2004, the defendant was convicted by a jury of twenty-one counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:2 (2007), four counts of endangering the welfare of a child, RSA 639:3 (2007), and one count of indecent exposure and lewdness, RSA 645:1 (2007).
On June 25, 2004, the trial court sentenced the defendant to an aggregate fifty to one hundred years in the state…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- California v. RamosSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Stevie Dewayne HarringtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- State v. FloodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. De La CruzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. FletcherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. Laryssa J. BennerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.