Leamanczyk v. A.H. Robins Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MAROYITZ, District Judge.
Motion For Partial Summary Judgment
Plaintiffs Jeanne and Jack Leamanczyk bring this action seeking damages for personal injuries allegedly resulting from Jeanne’s use of a DaL.on Shield IUD contraceptive device allegedly manufactured by defendant A.H. Robins Company (“Robins”). Jeanne Leamanczyk has alleged a variety of serious and permanent injuries, while her husband Jack Leamanczyk is seeking damages for loss of consortium. In Counts I and II of the complaint Jeanne seeks to recover damages based upon the theories of strict liability in tort and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hobby v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1983
- Kathleen M. Hansen v. A.H. Robins Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Kristeller v. A.H. Robins, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1983