Legal Opinion

Hobby v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided October 7, 1983No. Civ. 82-4039PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FOREMAN, Chief Judge:

Before the Court are motions for Summary Judgment by the following defendants: Keene Corporation, Armstrong Cork Corporation, Celotex Corporation, Standard Insulation, Inc., Pittsburg Corning, and GAF Corporation. On September 20, 1983, these motions were argued before the Court and several issues were raised regarding the applicable statute of limitations as well as factual questions regarding decedent’s alleged exposure to defendants’ products. The Court will address the statute of limitations arguments in this order, as these pertain to all…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Knierim v. IzzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Nolan v. Johns-Manville AsbestosIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Hall v. GillinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Saunders v. SchultzIllinois Supreme Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. RAYMOND CORPORATIONDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  2. Owens v. Glendale Optical Co.x`x`District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1984
  3. Reichert v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1991
  4. Kumpfer v. Shiley, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  5. In Re Asbestos Litigation, 01-4147 (2002)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API