Legal Opinion
Kathleen M. Hansen v. A.H. Robins Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 2, 1983No. 82-1986PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff commenced this action on June 24, 1981, against A.H. Robins Co. (Robins), for compensatory and punitive damages for personal injuries arising out of her use of the “Daikon Shield”, an intrauterine device 1 manufactured by Robins. On May 12, 1982, the District Court entered summary judgment in Robins’ favor finding that plaintiff’s claims were barred by the Wisconsin three-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions. 2 Plaintiff appeals the grant of summary judgment.
The plaintiff, Kathleen M. Hansen, had a Daikon Shield inserted in her uterus on May 28, 1974, by Dr.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Charlotte E. Neubauer, Cross-Appellants v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Cross-Appellees v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., Third Party Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jack Ray Allen and Sandy Lynn Allen, Husband and Wife v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Tolen v. AH Robins Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1983
- Lockett v. Owens-Corning FiberglasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Bullard v. Dalkon Shield TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Bullard v. Dalkon Shield TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.