Legal Opinion

Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Insurance Commissioner

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 9, 1978No. 1145, September Term, 1977PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, C. J.

“Once the decision to appeal has been made, the first, obvious and cardinal duty of the appellate advocate is to read with care and attention the rules of the Court of Appeals.” A. Scanlan, 1 Effective Appellate Advocacy in the Court of Appeals of Maryland, 29 Md. L. Rev. 126, 127 (1969). 2 The case now before us must fall casualty to appellant’s failure to comply with Md. Rules ch. 1100, “Subtitle B. Administrative Agencies — Appeal From.”

This appeal arises directly from a complaint filed by Myles Farley, the principal of Stansbury Joppatowne, Inc., trading as Stansbury Photo & Stereo…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Heaps v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Town of Somerset v. Montgomery County Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. Hecht v. CrookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  4. Dal Maso v. County Commrs.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  5. DAL MASO v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Erwin & Shafer, Inc. v. Pabst Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. MRM, INC. v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. Thompson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Wormwood v. Batching Systems, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Clarke v. GreenwellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API