Legal Opinion
Gault v. Nabisco Biscuit Co.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided February 22, 1999No. CV-S-97-0613-HDM(RJJ)PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHNSTON, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter came before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel (#35). The Plaintiff seeks an order from the Court pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, requiring the Defendant to answer certain interrogatories and certain requests for production of documents. Unfortunately, the Motion to Compel (# 35) is not timely and is therefore denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, David J. Gault, is suing the Defendant, Nabisco Biscuit Company for violating the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)(1), under theories of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shuffle Master, Inc. v. Progressive Games, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1996
- Byrnes v. Jetnet Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1986
- Kendrick v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
3Cited by37 opinions
- Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O'Lakes, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2007
- Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. v. Sonia InvestmentsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Clark v. Capital Credit & Collection Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Suntrust Bank v. Blue Water Fiber, L.P.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.