Suntrust Bank v. Blue Water Fiber, L.P.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
PEPE, United States Magistrate Judge.
On May 15, 2002, Plaintiff filed a motion to preclude testimony, or alternatively compel discovery (docket entry 267). On May 30, 2002, the Eddy Defendants1 filed their response, and Plaintiff filed a reply on June 13, 2002. A telephonic hearing was held on July 1, 2002, and it was ordered that supplemental briefs be filed on the issue of whether a party can file a motion to compel discovery approx*197imately 18 months after discovery has closed, after the dispositive motion deadline has passed, and after dispositive motions have…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Henry Lavado, Jr. v. Patrick W. KeohaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Diana Packman v. Chicago Tribune Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Front Page News, Incorporated, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Fannie B. Kalis v. Colgate-Palmolive Company, Millen True Value Hardware and Millen HardwareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Ghandi v. Police Department of City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pittman v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. v. Sonia InvestmentsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Suzlon Wind Energy Corporation v. Shippers Stevedoring CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.