Legal Opinion

Kyle v. Marcom

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1944PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailor

The complainants M. J. Kyle et al., in the first of the above cases, filed their bill in the Chancery Court of Clay County, Tennessee, alleging that'complainants were: (1) The duly elected Highway Commissioners of Clay County by reason of their election in the general election in August, 1942, and (2) that they were taxpayers of Clay County, Tennessee.

They filed this bill against the defendants,- W. A. Mar-com, Lester Brown, D. E. Birdwell, Prank Brown, and C. E. Clark, as the old, or former members of the Clay County Highway Commission, ánd against other named defendants as the sureties on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Goetz v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Hill v. RobertsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Gates v. LongTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State ex rel. National Conservation Exposition Co. v. WoolenTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Manis v. Farmers Bank of Sullivan CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dennis Moore v. Eugene Fowinkle, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Public HealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  2. City of Memphis v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Union, Local 1288Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hicks v. Rhea CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Black v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Cagle v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API