Black v. Wilson
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss'
delivered’the opinion of the Court.
This suit was brought'by seven of eight ro'adcommis-sidhers' of Hardeman County, elected in August, 1944, for. two yepf s, .challenging the constitutionality of Chapter ■ 539,,-private Acts of 1945', under which the defend"ants claim to have succeeded to these offices. On the h|ea,ringi th.e,-.c,pse was submitted on a1 single issue, whether, tl^e Act. of J945 was effective to abolish the offices held ■by: complainants below, as an incident of substantial and fundamental changes in the county road law, or was Merely a colorable enactment having for its…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- House v. CrevelingTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- Goetz v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- Smith v. SellsTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Haggard v. GallienTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Holland v. ParkerTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dorrier v. DarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- Memphis Publishing Company v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
- Freeman v. BursonTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Freeman v. BursonTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.