Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 24, 1999No. Nos. Civ. 96-2123 RCL, Civ. 97-1288 RCLPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion [374] to Compel Re-Designation of Witness on Surveillance Systems Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6) and for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. Upon consideration of plaintiffs’ motion, defendant Executive Office of the President’s opposition, and plaintiffs’ reply thereto, the Court will DENY plaintiffs’ motion without prejudice, as discussed and ordered below.

I. Background

The underlying allegations in this case arise from what has become popularly known as “Filegate.” Plaintiffs allege that their privacy…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
  2. Marker v. Union Fidelity Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1989
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. MorelliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  4. Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  5. Protective National Insurance v. Commonwealth InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hooker v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API