Legal Opinion

In re Kepecs

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 1, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from City Court of New York, Special Term. Heard on application of Morton Kepecs to punish Montz Adler and Morris Jacobs for contempt of court. Defendant Jacobs was found guilty, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

This appeal is taken from an order of the City Court of New York adjudging the appellant, an attorney at law, in contempt for having aided and abetted his client, a judgment debtor, in violating and disobeying an order in supplementary proceedings issued by said court, which forbade the judgment debtor “to transfer or make any other disposition of his property * * * or in any manner interfere therewith until the further order of the court.” A motion to vacate said order was made and denied, and on the day set for his examination the judgment debtor failed to appear. Shortly thereafter the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re FortunatoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1903
  2. In re William E. De Lany & Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re WillisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. A. Musto Co. v. Pioneer Cooperative BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  3. In re ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Franklin Factors Corp. v. Louis H. Green Furs, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API