Legal Opinion
A. Musto Co. v. Pioneer Cooperative Bank
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided June 1, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
A few days after the appellant Kipp brought the underlying complaint in the Superior Court on behalf of his client, A. Musto Co., Inc. (Musto), seeking, inter alia, to enjoin foreclosure sales of Musto’s real estate by certain mortgagees, the trial judge issued an order enjoining Kipp and Musto from filing "any ... form of legal action concerning or comprehending the subject matter of this action and against these defendants in any forum” without prior approval of the judge. Seven days later Kipp, in behalf of Musto, filed a petition under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. § 701 et…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Donovan v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- J. Clarke Smith and Margaret D. Smith v. Edwin E. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- In the Matter of Martin M. Decker and Kathleen H. Decker, Individually and Jointly, Debtors. Appeal of Leumi Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Price v. ColeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Butzloff v. QuandtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Diamond Hill Investment Co v. SheldenWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Diamond Hill Investment Co v. SheldenWyoming Supreme Court · 1989